Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Rapid and extensive developments in the field of information and communication technologies (ICT), especially in recent decades, have created a widespread foundation for profound and fundamental transformations in managerial, social, and organizational structures. These changes have not only revolutionized the way work is conducted but have also redefined the work environment, organizational relationships, and interpersonal interactions. In this context, the emergence of the Fifth Industrial Revolution has played a pivotal role as a turning point in the history of technological advancement. This revolution, characterized by the intelligent integration of physical, digital, and biological worlds—particularly through technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, cyber-physical systems, and advanced automation, while maintaining human-centric values and capabilities—is driving unprecedented changes in production, service delivery, and management patterns. This integration has not only enhanced organizational productivity and efficiency but has also challenged traditional concepts of work and physical presence. Under these circumstances, remote work has gained increasing attention as one of the most significant concepts in contemporary management and a novel approach to organizing job activities. Remote work is defined as performing job duties outside the organization’s central office, typically through digital environments and virtual communication. This work model became particularly prominent during the COVID-19 pandemic, emerging as an unavoidable necessity in many organizations, while simultaneously being recognized as an opportunity to increase flexibility, reduce operational costs, and improve employees’ work-life balance. Today, remote work is no longer an option—it is a necessity. However, the successful implementation of remote work requires careful attention to multiple factors spanning technological, organizational, psychological, and social dimensions.
Research Objective
The aim of this study is to examine the executive and structural requirements necessary for the effective utilization of remote work in organizations operating in the era of the Fifth Industrial Revolution. Given that remote work is no longer a temporary or limited option, but rather an established global and sustainable trend in the modern workplace, identifying its challenges and implementation necessities—particularly within the framework of Fifth Industrial Revolution concepts and human-centered approaches—has become a key priority in contemporary management. This research aims to provide a systematic and scientific framework to analyze the factors influencing the success or failure of remote work in organizations. It seeks to assist organizations in efficiently and sustainably managing this structural shift by identifying existing challenges and proposing practical solutions.
Research Methodology
This study employs Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) as its primary methodological framework. SSM is a qualitative, systems-thinking-based approach particularly suited to complex and multi-faceted situations where precise definitions and definitive solutions are absent. Positioned within the paradigm of Soft Operational Research (Soft OR), this method emphasizes the analysis of diverse stakeholder perspectives, human-centered problem definition, and the development of conceptual models to better understand socio-organizational systems. In this study, key SSM tools such as CATWOE analysis (Customers, Actors, Transformation process, Worldview, Owners, and Environmental constraints) were used to identify and analyze stakeholders, objectives, and limitations of the remote work system. This tool enabled the research team to examine the problem from multiple perspectives and formulate appropriate implementation strategies. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews with nine experienced experts in the fields of human resource management, information technology, organizational psychology, and digital transformation. Participants were selected from governmental, private, and international organizations to ensure diverse viewpoints and comprehensive findings. The interviews were conducted in-depth, focusing on practical experiences, encountered challenges, and successful strategies in implementing remote work. Subsequently, qualitative content analysis was employed to extract conceptual categories and identify key patterns.
Research Findings
The findings indicate that the implementation of remote work in the era of the Fifth Industrial Revolution faces numerous challenges at individual, organizational, and technological levels. At the individual level, role conflicts, reduced work-life balance, and stress due to social isolation were identified as three primary challenges. Many employees experience longer working hours, job burnout, and feelings of loneliness due to the lack of separation between work and home environments. Additionally, the reduction in face-to-face interactions with colleagues leads to weakened organizational belonging and diminished motivation. At the technological level, infrastructural limitations such as lack of access to high-speed internet, weak cybersecurity measures, absence of intelligent tools for remote work management, and high costs of necessary equipment and software are among the main barriers to the productivity and effectiveness of remote work. Furthermore, the lack of smart systems in both work and home environments—such as automated time management systems, intelligent monitoring tools, and integrated communication platforms—negatively impacts employee performance. These technological gaps hinder seamless collaboration, reduce operational efficiency, and increase the risk of data breaches and work disruptions, particularly in organizations that rely heavily on real-time coordination and data sensitivity. At the organizational level, the absence of transparent and integrated remote work policies, inadequate support structures (such as psychological counseling, continuous training, and technical support), and insufficient tools for evaluating employee performance were identified as other significant challenges. Many organizations still rely on traditional performance evaluation systems based on physical presence, which are incompatible with the nature of remote work and can lead to perceptions of unfairness, reduced motivation, and diminished trust between employees and management. Without clear guidelines, measurable objectives, and outcome-based assessment mechanisms, remote work can result in ambiguity in roles, accountability issues, and inconsistent performance across teams.
Discussion and Conclusion
The study demonstrates that remote work, as a global transformation in the world of work, despite its numerous challenges, holds high potential for improving employees' quality of life and enhancing organizational efficiency. The success of this transformation depends on organizations’ ability to adapt to new conditions, leverage emerging technologies, and foster a supportive and trust-based organizational culture. The recommendations derived from this research include the development of clear and comprehensive remote work policies, investment in technological infrastructure, strengthening psychological and social support systems, and designing performance evaluation frameworks based on outcomes rather than physical attendance. Such a model can serve as an operational framework for organizations to systematically identify gaps, set improvement goals, and implement targeted strategies for continuous enhancement of remote work systems. Ultimately, this research emphasizes that remote work is not merely a spatial shift—it represents a structural and cultural transformation that requires changes in mindsets, policies, and managerial systems. By adopting systemic approaches such as Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and paying close attention to the diversity of stakeholder perspectives, organizations can turn this transformation into a strategic opportunity. This includes increasing operational flexibility, attracting and retaining skilled talent, improving employee well-being, and building resilience to future challenges in the evolving world of work. Remote work, when implemented thoughtfully and inclusively, can become a cornerstone of sustainable and human-centered organizational development in the era of the Fifth Industrial Revolution.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., & Chang, V. (2025). A multi-criteria decision-making framework to evaluate the impact of industry 5.0 technologies: case study, lessons learned, challenges and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 27(2), 791-821. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌s10796-024-10472-3.
  2. Ahmadi, A., Cantinia, A., Frías, V. G., & Staudacher, A. P. (2025). The impact of labor flexibility on operational efficiency in industry 5.0: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 1-26. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌00207543.2025.2516770.
  3. Aslan, M., Yaman, F., Aksu, A., & Güngör, H. (2022). Task performance and job satisfaction under the effect of remote working: Call center evidence. Economics & Sociology.
  4. Bojovic, D., Benavides, J., & Soret, A. (2020). What we can learn from birdsong: mainstreaming teleworking in a postpandemic world. Earth system governance, 5, 100074.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌1016/‌j.esg.2020.100074.
  5. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2020). Soft systems methodology. Systems approaches to making change: A practical guide, 201-253. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-1-4471-7472-1_5
  6. Debashish, Sengupta., Dwa, Al-Khalifa. (2022). Pandemic Imposed Remote Work Arrangements and Resultant Work-Life Integration, Future of Work and Role of Leaders—A Qualitative Study of Indian Millennial Workers. Administrative Sciences, doi: https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌admsci1204016.
  7. Demir, K. A., Döven, G., & Sezen, B. (2019). Industry 5.0 and human-robot co-working. Procedia computer science, 158, 688-695. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.procs.2019.09.104.
  8. Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well‐being and work‐life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195-212. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌1111/‌ntwe.12097.
  9. Ferreira, R., Pereira, R., Bianchi, I. S., & da Silva, M. M. (2021). Decision factors for remote work adoption: advantages, disadvantages, driving forces and challenges. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 70. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌joitmc7010070.
  10. Gallacher, G., & Hossain, I. (2020). Remote work and employment dynamics under COVID-19: Evidence from Canada. Canadian public policy, 46(S1), S44-S54. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3138/‌cpp.2020-026.
  11. Halim, S. K., & Hendayana, Y. (2025). Developing Leadership Theories in Environment Remote Work. Jurnal Economic Resource, 8(1), 209-215. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.57178/‌jer.v8i1.1319.
  12. Hamza, S. A. (2020). A proposed model for an organized remote-work environment. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 2, 11-12. e-ISSN: 2582-5208.
  13. Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J. (2025). An integrated decision-making framework for evaluating Industry 5.0 and circular economy in supply chain management using Z-numbers. Applied Soft Computing, https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.asoc.2025.113504.
  14. Hosseini Dehshiri, S. J., & Amiri, M. (2025). Evaluating challenges of implementing industry 5.0 in the renewable energy supply chain toward sustainability: A comparative analysis using decision-making approaches. Energy Strategy Reviews, 59, 101761. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.esr.2025.101761.
  15. Jin, Q., Chen, H., & Hu, F. (2024). Proposal of industry 5.0-enabled sustainability of product–service systems and its quantitative multi-criteria decision-making method. Processes, 12(3), 473. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌pr12030473.
  16. Lo, H. W., Chan, H. W., Lin, J. W., & Lin, S. W. (2024). Evaluating the interrelationships of industrial 5.0 development factors using an integration approach of Fermatean fuzzy logic. Journal of Operations Intelligence, 2(1), 95-113. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.31181/‌jopi21202416.
  17. Lord, P. (2020). The social perils and promise of remote work. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Vol. 4, 63-67. https:/‌/‌dx.doi.org/‌10.2139/‌ssrn.3613235.
  18. Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q. V., Prabadevi, B., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., ... & Liyanage, M. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of industrial information integration, 26, 100257. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jii.2021.100257.
  19. Makowski, P. (2023). Remote leadership and work engagement: a critical review and future directions. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(4), 1-7. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.24018/‌ejbmr.2023.8.4.1835.
  20. Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., F. Rana, O., & Ranjan, R. (2024). Working in a smart home environment: examining the impact on productivity, well-being and future use intention. Internet Research, 34(2), 447-473. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌INTR-12-2021-0931.
  21. McPhail, R., Chan, X. W., May, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2024). Post-COVID remote working and its impact on people, productivity, and the planet: an exploratory scoping review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(1), 154-182. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌09585192.2023.2221385.
  22. Mshangi, M., Nfuka, E. N., & Sanga, C. (2017). An innovative soft design science methodology for improving development of a secure information system in Tanzania using multi-layered approach. Journal of Information Security, 8(3), 141-165. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.4236/‌jis.2017.83010.
  23. Nigam, P., & Tiwari, S. K. (2025). The Interplay Between Remote Work, Employee Engagement, and Customer Satisfaction in It Companies: A Post-Pandemic Analysis. Journal of East-West Thought (JET) ISSN (O): 2168-2259 UGC CARE I, 15(1), 1331-1341. https:/‌/‌jetjournal.us/‌index.php/‌journals/‌article/‌view/‌773.
  24. Paucar-Caceres, A., & Jerardino-Wiesenborn, B. (2020). A bridge for two views: Checkland’s soft systems methodology and Maturana’s ontology of the observer. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(4), 660-672. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌01605682.2019.1578629.
  25. Sandfreni, S., & Adikara, F. (2020). The implementation of soft system methodology (SSM) for systems development in organizations (Study case: the development of tourism information system in Palembang City). In Proceedings of the First International Conference of Science, Engineering and Technology, ICSET 2019, November 23 2019, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  26. Schmitt, J. (2024). Employee Well-Being and the Remote Leader: A Systematic Literature Review. Central European Business Review, 13(1), 27-42.
  27. Shah, M. R. (2025). Remote Work and Talent Management Post-Pandemic: Analyzing the Evolution of Employee Engagement and Performance Metrics. AEIDA: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 24-33.‏ http:/‌/‌aeidajournal.org/‌index.php/‌AEIDA/‌article/‌view/‌13.
  28. Singh, P., Bala, H., Dey, B. L., & Filieri, R. (2022). Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Business Research, 151, 269-286. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jbusres.2022.07.002.
  29. Sostero, M., Milasi, S., Hurley, J., Fernandez-Macias, E., & Bisello, M. (2023). Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: potential and actual prevalence of remote work across Europe. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 13(1), 1-25.
  30. Van Nieuwerburgh, S. (2023). The remote work revolution: Impact on real estate values and the urban environment: 2023 AREUEA Presidential Address. Real Estate Economics, 51(1), 7-48. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1111/‌1540-6229.12422.
  31. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied psychology, 70(1), 16-59. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1111/‌apps.12290.
  32. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of manufacturing systems, 61, 530-535. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jmsy.2021.10.006
  33. Andalib, D.,& Rostami, KH. (2016). Impact on teleworking on organizational performance with structural equation modeling. Business Management Explorations, 8(16), 141-159. http:/‌/‌noo.rs/‌VAmk8. (In Persian)
  34. Davali, M. M., Haghdoust, S. and Masoumzadeh Jouzdani, R. (2022). The effect of telework on employee job satisfaction with the role of mediators of job independence and work-family conflict. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 57-82. doi:https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22108/‌cbs.2022.133711.1650. (In Persian)
  35. Feili, M.,& Tavallaei, R,. (2022). A Conceptual Design for Knowledge Management System 2.0 Based on Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) Approach. Development Management Process, 34(4), 187-212. http:/‌/‌dx.doi.org/‌10.52547/‌jmdp.34.4.187. (In Persian)
  36. Heidari Haratemeh, M. (2024). The Effect of Cultural Background on the Relationship Between Telework and Employees' Job Stress. Strategic Studies of Culture, 4(1), 9-39. doi: https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌22083/‌scsj.2024.451528.1165. (In Persian)
  37. Malekijahan, A., Shoar, M., Rajabzadeh Ghatari, A. and Fard, A. (2023). Measuring the amount of radio wave radiation of BTS antennas using the regulatory model with Soft systems methodology approach (Study case: Ahvaz metropolis). Journal of Radiation Safety and Measurement, 12(2), 57-71. doi: https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22052/‌rsm.2023.253008.1027. (In Persian)
  38. pourshahabi, V. and Sarhaddi, F. (2024). The effect of telework on reducing staff burnout during Covid-19 restrictions (Case study: Sistan and Baluchestan University). Public Management Researches, 17(63), 179-210. doi: https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌22111/‌jmr.2022.39224.5546. (In Persian)
  39. Shahrabi Farahani, A., GHanbarian, R. and Daneshfar, S. (2022). Designing Tehran Municipality Planning and Budgeting Alignment Model Using Soft System Methodology (SSM). Urban Economics and Planning, 3(3), 52-67. doi: https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌22034/‌uep.2022.339121.1240. (In Persian)