Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of industrial management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’I University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Arak University, Arak, Iran.

3 Master's degree in Industrial Management, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In an era of intensifying global competition and unprecedented environmental, economic, and technological changes, organizations require a high level of readiness to adopt Industry 5.0-based technologies and business models. This study aims to investigate the impact of Industry 5.0 readiness on sustainable business growth, considering the mediating roles of efficiency, responsiveness, and competitive advantage, with a case study of Mobarakeh Steel Company in Iran. Despite the growing body of research on Industry 5.0, a literature review indicates that the impact of Industry 5.0 readiness on efficiency, responsiveness, competitive advantage, and sustainable business growth has not yet been examined within an integrated framework. The research is applied in nature and follows a descriptive-correlational design. Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire from a purposive sample of 105 employees. The validity of the instrument, including content, convergent, and discriminant validity, as well as its reliability, was confirmed. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results revealed that Industry 5.0 readiness significantly enhances organizational efficiency and responsiveness. These two factors, in turn, strengthen competitive advantage and ultimately lead to sustainable business growth. Moreover, efficiency and responsiveness were found to mediate the relationship between Industry 5.0 readiness and competitive advantage. These findings offer practical guidance for industrial managers aiming to strategically transition toward Industry 5.0 and effectively leverage emerging technologies through a human-centric approach to achieve sustainable growth.
Introduction
The growing complexities of global supply chains, the imperative for sustainability, and the limitations of automation-focused paradigms have accelerated the shift toward Industry 5.0. Unlike Industry 4.0, which predominantly emphasizes automation and digitalization, Industry 5.0 integrates human-centricity, resilience, and sustainability as core values. Industry 5.0 readiness promotes a collaborative interface between humans and smart machines to enhance operational performance while considering social and environmental responsibilities. In this context, Industry 5.0 readiness emerges as a critical construct that reflects an organization’s capability to adopt, internalize, and benefit from emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, collaborative robots, digital twins, blockchain, and big data analytics in a manner aligned with human and environmental values. While this concept has gained attention globally, empirical investigations into its impact on business outcomes remain limited. The steel industry, given its scale, energy intensity, and central role in economic development, represents a compelling sector for exploring Industry 5.0 transformation. Among leading firms in this domain, Mobarakeh Steel Company (MSC) in Iran has launched several digital transformation initiatives aligning itself with the broader agenda of Industry 5.0. This study examines the impact of Industry 5.0 readiness on sustainable business growth, considering the mediating roles of operational efficiency, organizational responsiveness, and competitive advantage. Despite the growing body of research on Industry 5.0, a literature review indicates that the impact of Industry 5.0 readiness on efficiency, responsiveness, competitive advantage, and sustainable business growth has not yet been examined within an integrated framework.
Methodology
This study employed a quantitative, applied, and correlational design to investigate the effect of Industry 5.0 readiness on sustainable business growth, mediated by efficiency, responsiveness, and competitive advantage. The target population comprised employees of Mobarakeh Steel Company, which has undertaken several initiatives aligned with Industry 5.0 principles. A structured questionnaire was designed to capture respondents' perceptions of their organization's readiness for Industry 5.0, its operational and strategic capabilities, and sustainable growth outcomes. The instrument included 17 items distributed across six constructs: Industry 5.0 readiness, efficiency, responsiveness, competitive advantage, and sustainable business growth. All items were measured on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). The sampling strategy was purposive, aimed at selecting employees involved in digital transformation initiatives or operational excellence programs. A total of 105 valid responses were collected. Despite the limitation of not including executive-level policymakers, the selected respondents possessed relevant knowledge of the technological and operational transformations within MSC. To ensure validity and reliability, several procedures were undertaken. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using outer loadings, Average Variance Extracted (AVE), and the Fornell–Larcker criterion. The composite reliability (CR) and Cronbach’s alpha values for all constructs exceeded the accepted threshold of 0.7, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The hypothesized relationships were tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 3.0.
Findings
The analysis of the structural model using PLS-SEM revealed several statistically significant relationships that validate the hypothesized impact pathways of Industry 5.0 readiness on sustainable business growth. The R² values for key endogenous variables, efficiency (0.57), responsiveness (0.54), competitive advantage (0.62), and sustainable business growth (0.66), indicate a good level of explanatory power for the model. The effect sizes (f²) were also moderate to strong, particularly for the paths from Industry 5.0 readiness to efficiency and responsiveness. The results confirmed that Industry 5.0 readiness has a significant and positive impact on both operational efficiency and organizational responsiveness. This finding aligns with Nazarian and Khan (2024), who demonstrated similar performance outcomes in European manufacturing contexts, and supports the idea that transitioning toward human-machine collaboration and real-time data systems yields operational improvements. In turn, efficiency and responsiveness were found to enhance competitive advantage, highlighting their mediating roles significantly. This corroborates Madhavan et al. (2024), who found that Industry 5.0-oriented capabilities in Thai marine SMEs improved competitive positioning through operational excellence. In the case of MSC, efficiency gains through AI-based predictive maintenance and responsiveness improvements via flexible scheduling systems contributed to a stronger market stance. Moreover, competitive advantage was shown to influence sustainable business growth significantly, suggesting that firms that achieve superior operational and strategic performance are more likely to maintain long-term viability and growth. This is consistent with studies by Alabi et al. (2025) and Bayatzadeh & Talaei (2024), who emphasized the link between technological transformation and long-term sustainability in industrial ecosystems. Importantly, the indirect effects of Industry 5.0 readiness on competitive advantage, through both efficiency and responsiveness, were also significant, confirming the partial mediating roles of these two capabilities. These results suggest that readiness for Industry 5.0 contributes not only to immediate performance benefits but also to longer-term strategic positioning, especially when internal capabilities are leveraged effectively.
Discussion and Conclusion
This study provides a nuanced exploration of how Industry 5.0 readiness contributes to sustainable business growth by enhancing efficiency, responsiveness, and competitive advantage, using the case of Mobarakeh Steel Company (MSC) in Iran. The study confirms the arguments of Nazarian and Khan (2024) that efficiency and responsiveness are critical conduits for the value generated by Industry 5.0 principles, such as smart automation and AI-human collaboration. It also aligns with the model proposed by Madhavan et al. (2024), showing that Industry 5.0 readiness can trigger significant organizational improvements when accompanied by complementary capabilities. Practically, the research illustrates how Industry 5.0 readiness serves as an enabler of sustainable growth, even in emerging economies where full deployment of Industry 5.0 technologies is not yet widespread. In the case of MSC, evidence from internal reports and strategic documents confirms the the Industry 5.0 readiness. Moreover, the results indicate that efficiency and responsiveness function as effective mediators, reinforcing the notion that performance benefits are not direct consequences of technology adoption, but instead are of the organization’s capacity to integrate and leverage such technologies. Looking ahead, these findings suggest that companies aiming to embark on their Industry 5.0 journey should focus not only on acquiring advanced technologies but also on developing internal capabilities, promoting a human-centric culture, and aligning operations with sustainability goals. Future research could explore cross-industry comparisons or longitudinal analyses to assess the evolution of Industry 5.0 readiness and its impact over time.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Alabi, A. T. (2025). A Critical Exploration of Industry 5.0 in Sustainable Business Performance of SMEs: A Framework for i5. 0 Integration. In The Future of Small Business in Industry 5.0(pp. 85-114). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.http:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.4018/‌979-8-3693-7362-0.ch004
  2. Bhima, B., Zahra, A. R. A., Nurtino, T., & Firli, M. Z. (2023). Enhancing organizational efficiency through the integration of artificial intelligence in management information systems. APTISI Transactions on Management7(3), 282-289.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.33050/‌atm.v7i3.2146
  3. Blinova, E., Ponomarenko, T., & Knysh, V. (2022). Analyzing the concept of corporate sustainability in the context of sustainable business development in the mining sector with elements of circular economy. Sustainability14(13), 8163.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌su14138163
  4. Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Hein-Pensel, F., Schero, E., Winkler, H., & Jabs, I. (2025). Assessing industry 5.0 readiness—Prototype of a holistic digital index to evaluate sustainability, resilience and human-centered factors. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights5(1), 100329.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jjimei.2025.100329
  5. Chib, S., Raj, S., Reddy, Y. M., Lakhanpal, S., & Kulkarni, A. D. (2024). Using Big Data Analytics to Supply Chain Management to Unlock Organizational Efficiency. In 2024 International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE)(pp. 1542-1546). IEEE.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1109/‌IC3SE62002.2024.10593470
  6. Dai, N. H. P., Giang, P. P., & Kiet, T. H. V. T. (2024). Readiness of enterprises to implement Industry 5.0: Challenges and security concerns. In Modern Technologies and Tools Supporting the Development of Industry 5.0(pp. 408-443). CRC Press.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1201/‌9781003489269
  7. Dewantara, H., Hafish, M., & Pranata, M. A. (2024). The Impact of Innovation Strategies on Competitive Advantage: The Role of Students in the Digital Creative Industry during Industry 5.0. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management Business and Accounting2(2), 77-83.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.61255/‌jeemba.v2i2.358
  8. Duah, E., Pakmoni, L., & Appiah-Kubi, E. (2025). Green human resource management and organizational efficiency among local assemblies: role of process innovation and knowledge sharing. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance12(1), 168-190.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌JOEPP-11-2023-0511
  9. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Morales, M. E., Nilashi, M., & Amran, A. (2023). Actions and approaches for enabling Industry 5.0‐driven sustainable industrial transformation: A strategy roadmap. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management30(3), 1473-1494.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1002/‌csr.2431
  10. Gigauri, I., & Janjua, L. R. (2023). Digital and sustainable products to achieve sustainable business goals along the path to industry 5.0. In Digitalization, sustainable development, and industry 5.0: An organizational model for twin transitions(pp. 25-40). Emerald Publishing Limited.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌978-1-83753-190-520231003
  11. Hair, J. F., Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1177/‌1094428114526928
  12. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., ... & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook, 1-29.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-030-80519-7_1
  13. Huang, S., Wang, B., Li, X., Zheng, P., Mourtzis, D., & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution. Journal of manufacturing systems64, 424-428.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jmsy.2022.07.010
  14. Huy, P. Q., & Phuc, M. V. K. (2024). Structural dimensions and measurement of readiness for Industry 5.0 implementation: A fresher insight from SMEs in developing country. In Modern Technologies and Tools Supporting the Development of Industry 5.0(pp. 75-106). CRC Press.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1201/‌9781003489269
  15. Islam, A., & Abd Wahab, S. (2021). The intervention of strategic innovation practices in between regulations and sustainable business growth: a holistic perspective for Malaysian SMEs. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development17(3), 396-421.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌WJEMSD-04-2020-0035
  16. Jaafar, M., Khan, K. N., & Salman, A. (2025). A systematic review and framework for organizational agility antecedents towards industry 4.0. Management Review Quarterly, 1-26.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌s11301-025-00489-6
  17. Jassem, S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Accounting Practices in the Industry 5.0 Era from a Dynamic Capabilities Perspective: Role of Strategic Foresight, Agility, and Flexibility. In Opportunities and Risks in AI for Business Development: Volume 1(pp. 149-160). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-031-65203-5_14
  18. Kahveci, E. (2025). Digital transformation in SMEs: enablers, interconnections, and a framework for sustainable competitive advantage. Administrative Sciences15(3), 107.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌admsci15030107
  19. Kasinathan, P., Pugazhendhi, R., Elavarasan, R. M., Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., Ramanathan, V., Subramanian, S., ... & Alsharif, M. H. (2022). Realization of sustainable development goals with disruptive technologies by integrating industry 5.0, society 5.0, smart cities and villages. Sustainability14(22), 15258.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌su142215258
  20. Keskar, A. (2024). Driving operational excellence in manufacturing through generative AI: Transformative approaches for efficiency, innovation, and scalability. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews11, 245-261.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.6084/‌m9.doi.one.IJRAR24A3611
  21. Krakowski, S., Luger, J., & Raisch, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the changing sources of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal44(6), 1425-1452.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1002/‌smj.3387
  22. Lachvajderová, L., & Kádárová, J. (2022). Industry 4.0 implementation and Industry 5.0 readiness in industrial enterprises. Management and Production Engineering Review13.http:/‌/‌dx.doi.org/‌10.24425/‌mper.2022.142387
  23. Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., ... & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect. Journal of Manufacturing Systems65, 279-295.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jmsy.2022.09.017
  24. Madhavan, M., Sharafuddin, M. A., & Wangtueai, S. (2024). Impact of Industry 5.0 Readiness on Sustainable Business Growth of Marine Food Processing SMEs in Thailand. Administrative Sciences14(6), 110.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌admsci14060110
  25. Madhavan, M., Sharafuddin, M. A., & Wangtueai, S. (2024). Measuring the Industry 5.0-readiness level of SMEs using Industry 1.0–5.0 practices: The case of the seafood processing industry. Sustainability16(5), 2205.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌su16052205
  26. Majiwala, H., & Kant, R. (2025). Evaluating Sustainable Development Goals Achieved Through Industry 5.0‐Enabled Circular Practices. Environmental Quality Management34(3), e70069.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1002/‌tqem.70069
  27. Masoomi, B., Sahebi, I. G., Ghobakhloo, M., & Mosayebi, A. (2023). Do industry 5.0 advantages address the sustainable development challenges of the renewable energy supply chain? Sustainable Production and Consumption43, 94-112.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.spc.2023.10.018
  28. Motwani, J., & Katatria, A. (2024). Organization agility: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management73(9), 2709-2754.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJPPM-07-2023-0383
  29. Ashutosh Muduli, Anuva Choudhury; Exploring the role of workforce agility on digital transformation: a systematic literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal 19 February 2025; 32 (2): 492–512.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌BIJ-02-2023-0108
  30. Murugesan, B. (2025). Strategic Integration of IoT and AI: Optimizing Techno Management for Enhanced Organizational Efficiency. In 2025 First International Conference on Advances in Computer Science, Electrical, Electronics, and Communication Technologies (CE2CT)(pp. 966-969). IEEE.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1109/‌CE2CT64011.2025.10940007
  31. Naveed, R. T., Alhaidan, H., Al Halbusi, H., & Al-Swidi, A. K. (2022). Do organizations really evolve? The critical link between organizational culture and organizational innovation toward organizational effectiveness: Pivotal role of organizational resistance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge7(2), 100178.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jik.2022.100178
  32. Nazarian, H., & Khan, S. A. (2024). The impact of industry 5.0 on supply chain performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management16, 18479790241297022.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1177/‌18479790241297022
  33. Romanova, O. A., & Sirotin, D. V. (2024). From Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: Problems and Opportunities for the Metal Industry Development in Russia. Steel in Translation54(2), 120-126.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3103/‌S0967091224700438
  34. Saini, A., & Garg, V. (Eds.). (2023). Transformation for sustainable business and management practices: exploring the spectrum of industry 5.0. Emerald Publishing Limited.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌978-1-80262-277-520231023
  35. Shafique, M. N., Adeel, U., & Rashid, A. (2024). The Synergy Between Industry 5.0 and Circular Economy for Sustainable Performance in the Chinese Manufacturing Industry. Sustainability16(22), 9952.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌su16229952
  36. Sharma, R., & Gupta, H. (2024). Harmonizing sustainability in industry 5.0 era: Transformative strategies for cleaner production and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Cleaner Production445, 141118.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jclepro.2024.141118
  37. Siddiqui, A. F., Paul, A. J., Mishra, S., & Balamurugan, S. (2025). Cobots for Industry 5.0 Transformation. Intelligent Robots and Cobots: Industry 5.0 Applications, 1-17.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1002/‌9781394198252.ch1
  38. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of manufacturing systems61, 530-535.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jmsy.2021.10.006
  39. Zhang, M., Wang, Y., & Wang, W. (2025). Big data analytics managerial skills and organizational agility: a moderated mediation model. Industrial Management & Data Systems125(1), 168-191.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IMDS-01-2024-0053
  40. Bayatzadeh, S. and Talaie, H. (2024). Identifying and evaluating of sustainable and resilient supplier selection criteria according to industry 5.0 concepts (case study: steel industry). Journal of Decisions and Operations Research, 9(4), 1045-1063.https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22105/‌dmor.2025.498734.1904