Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Strategic Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Associate Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
This research aims to design a model for the internationalization of companies operating under uncertainty, seeking to address the shortcomings of existing one-dimensional approaches that ignore the dynamic and behavioral complexities of stakeholders. This research is applied and developmental in terms of its purpose, and mixed and exploratory in terms of its type. Data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from managers and experts involved in the internationalization process of small and medium-sized companies, who were selected through purposive sampling. The final model was developed using fuzzy soft systems methodology and fuzzy structural interpretive modeling. The final model identifies key dimensions for the internationalization of companies under uncertainty. These dimensions include: monitoring macro trends, developing a technology ecosystem, financial and advisory support, developing standards, managing stakeholder relationships, developing specialized training centers, advanced intelligent systems for forecasting, developing flexible entry strategies, networking and strategic alliances, optimizing product quality and processes, and managing supply chain complexity. The presented model serves as an analytical tool for a deeper understanding of the complexities of internationalization in small and medium-sized enterprises and for more effective policymaking in the face of uncertainties in the business environment.
Introduction
To maintain and improve their competitive standing in the dynamic global marketplace, many businesses are adopting an internationalization strategy. The increasing volume of international trade and investment, coupled with the central role of firms in this arena, has made corporate internationalization a crucial topic in international business studies. The internationalization of a company is the process through which a business expands its operations beyond national borders and enters foreign markets. This process encompasses a wide range of activities, from establishing subsidiaries abroad to exporting goods and services internationally. By adopting an internationalization approach, companies can mitigate their business risks and achieve potentially greater returns compared to operating solely in domestic markets. However, the successful implementation of this strategy is influenced by numerous factors that must be carefully considered. When a company decides to enter international markets, it encounters distinct institutional and cultural characteristics that vary from country to country. Consequently, to succeed in this arena and owing to the inherent complexity and uncertainty of the process, managers require sufficient knowledge and awareness to efficiently process and analyze information and make sound decisions. This knowledge base enables them to effectively address the challenges arising from cultural and institutional differences.
In theoretical literature, the process of company internationalization is usually explained through two main perspectives. The first perspective suggests that the internationalization of companies occurs via an incremental process involving stages, beginning in the domestic market and gradually expanding to international ones. Conversely, the second perspective, derived from international entrepreneurship, posits that a company can access several global markets from the outset. Considering the diverse perspectives in international business research, Glaum & Oesterle contend that establishing a unified definition for company internationalization has remained difficult and challenging, even after several years of dedicated research in the field.
Johanson & Vahlne categorize company internationalization into four main stages: start-up, full launch, independent international activities, and joint international activities. Their viewpoint is predicated on the idea that internationalization involves creating and expanding connections with other actors within a foreign network. They assert that a company’s internationalization process initiates with interactions in local networks, subsequently extending to other countries as the business relationships within these networks mature. This development is accomplished through establishing new connections within networks new to the company, strengthening existing relationships in these networks, and ultimately integrating networks across different countries. Johanson & Vahlne define internationalization as the process of developing business relationship networks in other countries through expansion, penetration, and integration. The focus of this definition is clearly on relationships and networks, which subsequently facilitate companies’ entry into foreign market networks.
Liu & Ko view internationalization as the process of organizing and deploying global economic resources, such as capital, raw materials, human resources, information, markets, and management capabilities. Costa et al. believe that internationalization enables companies to access new markets to create novel business activities and generate profit. Finally, Dominguez & Mayrhofer state that, according to the born global model, certain companies rapidly enter a significant number of markets from inception. In fact, born global companies are those that have achieved a considerable degree of internationalization right from their inception or early operational stages. Therefore, considering the presence of diverse and influential stakeholders and actors, dynamic and behavioral complexities, and inherent uncertainties in the internationalization process of SMEs, coupled with the significant share of SMEs, the main research question is as follows:
What is the internationalization model for companies in small and medium-sized industries (SMEs) under conditions of uncertainty?
Methodology
This research employs a mixed-methods approach (both qualitative and quantitative) with an applied-developmental purpose and a descriptive-exploratory strategy. The primary aim is to provide solutions for the challenges of SME internationalization and to provide decision-making support to relevant stakeholders. Furthermore, due to a scarcity of sufficient information, the study also seeks to develop a comprehensive model for SME internationalization under conditions of uncertainty. The qualitative phase commenced with a literature review encompassing articles, books, projects, and documents related to SME internationalization. Subsequently, expert opinions, gathered through a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) framework and Fuzzy Interpretive Structural Modeling (FISM), were integrated to develop a final model for SME internationalization under uncertainty.
Results
This research utilized the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) to investigate the internationalization of SMEs. In the initial stage, dedicated to encountering and understanding the problematic situation, in-depth interviews with experts and stakeholders were conducted to extract actors from both the distant and near environments, leading to the development of a Rich Picture. The findings of this research confirm that the internationalization of SMEs is a multifaceted and dynamic process fundamentally dependent on the coordination and synergy between various factors across different levels. The conceptual model developed illustrates that success hinges upon a systematic approach that simultaneously integrates internal company factors, environmental dynamics, and institutional frameworks. Effective implementation of this model is contingent upon continuous monitoring of global activities and trends, rigorous assurance of methodological compatibility, proactive prediction and consideration of inherent uncertainties, and the committed participation of all key stakeholders, including SMEs, governmental bodies (such as the Industry, Mining, and Trade Organization), supporting entities (like the Chamber of Commerce and Industrial Estates Company), and regulatory agencies (Customs and the Standards Organization).
Keywords
Main Subjects
- Heidarizad, Z., Fazlzadeh, A., Ahmadian, V., & Nagdi, S. (2024). The impact of e-commerce on export: A meta-analytic review. Journal of International Business Administration, 7(2), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.22034/JIBA.2024.60534.2176 (in Persian).
- Rahimiaghdam, S., Sanoubar, N., & Ahmadian, A. (2023). Investigating the effect of strategic agility on SMEs international success with the mediating role of network-oriented growth. Journal of International Business Administration, 6(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.22034/JIBA.2023.55884.2030 (in Persian).
- Sanoubar, H., Jabbarzadeh, Y., & Hosseini, S. S. (2022). The role of innovation capability on export performance with the mediating role of social capital. Journal of International Business Administration, 5(3), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.22034/JIBA.2022.50028.1843 (in Persian).
- Magholi Hasanjani, A., Makui, A., & Bonyadi Naeini, A. (2023). Designing a dynamic model for internationalization of small & medium-sized knowledge-based enterprises (case study: herbal medicine industry). Journal of International Business Administration, 6(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.22034/JIBA.2023.54010.1968 (in Persian).
- Adedoyin, F. F., Afolabi, J. O., Yalçiner, K., & Bekun, F. V. (2022). The export led growth in Malaysia: Does economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risks matter? Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2361. https://hdl.handle.net/11363/5588
- Ahmed, F. U., & Brennan, L. (2019). The impact of founder’s human capital on firms’ extent of early internationalisation: Evidence from a least-developed country. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(3), 615–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09646-4
- Alcaraz, J., Martinez-Suarez, J., & Montoya, M. A. (2024). Effect of populism on the internationalization of emerging market firms. European Business Review, 36(1), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-01-2023-0025
- Ansoff, H. I., Kipley, D., Lewis, A. O., Helm-Stevens, R., Ansoff, R., Ansoff, H. I., … & Ansoff, R. (2019). Strategic dimensions of internationalization (pp. 311-336). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99599-1_14
- Bacudio, L. R., Benjamin, M. F. D., Eusebio, R. C. P., Holaysan, S. A. K., Promentilla, M. A. B., Yu, K. D. S., & Aviso, K. B. (2016). Analyzing barriers to implementing industrial symbiosis networks using DEMATEL. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 7, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.03.001
- Bae, J. W., Elkamhi, R., & Simutin, M. (2019). The best of both worlds: Accessing emerging economies via developed markets. The Journal of Finance, 74(5), 2579-2617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2016.03.001
- Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A., & El Ghaoui, L. (2009). Robust optimization. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831050
- Bianchi, C., & Stoian, M. C. (2024). Exploring the role of managerial and organizational capabilities for the inbound internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(2), 724-762. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2022.2082457
- Bianchi, C., & Wickramasekera, R. (2016). Antecedents of SME export intensity in a Latin American market. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4368-4376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.041
- Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, N., & Morgan, R. E. (2022). Unbundling the effects of internationalization on firm performance in emerging economies: The moderating effects of strategic resource decisions. Journal of International Marketing, 30(1), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X211030686
- Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. (2016). Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 319-407. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1120957
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
- Cerrato, D., & Piva, M. (2012). The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9166-x
- Chang, C. H., Chang, C. H., Hsu, P. K., & Yang, S. Y. (2019). The catalytic effect of internationalization on innovation. European Financial Management, 25(4), 942-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12190
- Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2020). Soft systems methodology. In Systems approaches to making change: A practical guide (pp. 201-253). London: Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7472-1_5
- Costa, A. D., Camboim, G. F., & Zen, A. C. (2018). Internationalization patterns and their effects on company performance. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management (JOSCM), 11(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.12660/joscmv11n1p53-63
- Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Ciravegna, L., Melgarejo, M., & Lopez, L. (2018). Home country uncertainty and the internationalization-performance relationship: Building an uncertainty management capability. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.002
- Danziger, E., & Danziger, L. (2025). Demand uncertainty and the optimal number of export destinations. Review of International Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12780
- Dike, M. C., & Rose, E. L. (2017). Internationalization of mobile telecommunications: A systematic literature review. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(3), 308-321. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-01-2017-0004
- Dominguez, N., & Mayrhofer, U. L. (2017). Internationalization of traditional SMEs. Journal of International Business Review, 26(1), 1051-1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.03.010
- Du, J., Zhu, S., & Li, W. H. (2023). Innovation through internationalization: A systematic review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(3), 1217-1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09814-z
- Fang, F. (2023). Corporate innovation and internationalization: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104087
- Freixanet, J., & Rialp, J. (2022). Disentangling the relationship between internationalization, incremental and radical innovation, and firm performance. Global Strategy Journal, 12(1), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1412
- Gande, A., Schenzler, C., & Senbet, L. W. (2009). Valuation effects of global diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1515-1532. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.59
- Glaum, M., & Oesterle, M. J. (2007). 40 years of research on internationalization and firm performance: More questions than answers? Management International Review, 47, 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0018-0
- Gumus, A. T., Yayla, A. Y., Çelik, E., & Yildiz, A. (2013). A combined fuzzy-AHP and fuzzy-GRA methodology for hydrogen energy storage method selection in Turkey. Energies, 6(6), 3017-3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/en6063017
- Haarhaus, T., & Liening, A. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120033
- Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00429.x
- Hsu, W. T., Chen, H. L., & Cheng, C. Y. (2013). Internationalization and firm performance of SMEs: The moderating effects of CEO attributes. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.001
- Hu, G., & Liu, S. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and China’s export fluctuation in the post-pandemic era: An empirical analysis based on the TVP-SV-VAR model. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 788171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.788171
- Ipsmiller, E., & Dikova, D. (2021). Internationalization from Central and Eastern Europe: A systematic literature review. Journal of International Management, 27(4), 100862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100862
- Jeng, D. J. F. (2015). Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration using the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.05.007
- Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (2013). Internationalisation in industrial systems—a network approach. In Strategies in Global Competition (RLE International Business) (pp. 287-314). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508829.0011
- Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2015). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. In International business strategy (pp. 33-59). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24
- Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Deligonul, S., Perry, M. Z., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2012). A multilevel examination of the drivers of firm multinationality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 38(2), 502-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310369
- Kumari, S., Shirodkar, V., & McGuire, S. (2025). The impact of home institutions on the internationalization of emerging market SMEs: A systematic review. Multinational Business Review, 33(1), 68-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-03-2024-0045
- Lebedev, S., Sun, S. L., Markóczy, L., & Peng, M. W. (2021). Board political ties and firm internationalization. Journal of International Management, 27(3), 100860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100860
- Li, D., Zhao, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, L., & Liu, Y. (2023). Too far East is West: CEO overconfidence influences firm internationalization in emerging economies. Management International Review, 63(3), 377-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-023-00505-5
- Likitwongkajon, N., & Vithessonthi, C. (2023). Internationalization and firm performance. Global Finance Journal, 56, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100753
- Liu, H., & Ko, W. (2017). Measuring the degree of internationalization for Taiwanese banking industry: Scoring measurement by principal component analysis. International Business Research, 10(6), 212-226. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v10n6p212
- Loué, C. (2018). Firms and internationalization: An approach based on the skills and the profile of the entrepreneur. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 30(5), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1459013
- Milevoj, E., Beleska-Spasova, E., & Bommer, W. H. (2021). Influence of CEO and firm characteristics on SME internationalization: Evidence from California. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 31. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.29810
- Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Datta, D. K. (2010). The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.12.003
- Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2011). The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: The choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.003
- Odei, S. A., & Stejskal, J. (2020). Firms’ pursuit of innovations through internationalization: A treatment effect estimation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(4), 837-866. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12484
- Oesterle, M. J., Elosge, C., & Elosge, L. (2016). Me, myself and I: The role of CEO narcissism in internationalization decisions. International Business Review, 25(5), 1114-1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.02.001
- Ouyang, Y. Y., Huang, X. F., & Zhong, L. M. (2020). The impact of outward foreign direct investment on environmental pollution in home country: Local and spatial spillover effects. China Industrial Economics, 2, 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2021.12.024
- Peng, M. W. (2014). Global strategy (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Pongelli, C., Majocchi, A., Bauweraerts, J., Sciascia, S., Caroli, M., & Verbeke, A. (2023). The impact of board of directors’ characteristics on the internationalization of family SMEs. Journal of World Business, 58(2), 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101412
- Pramod, V. R., & Banwet, D. K. (2013). Fuzzy ISM for analyzing the inhibitors of a telecom service supply chain. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), 6(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.4018/jisscm.2013010105
- Roedder, F., & Schmid, S. (2023). How internationalization leads to more CSR: The case of Japanese firms. Journal of General Management, 03063070231197343. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231197343
- Ruzzier, M., & Ruzzier, M. K. (2015). On the relationship between firm size, resources, age at entry and internationalization: The case of Slovenian SMEs. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(1), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.745812
- Sang, M., Zhang, L., & Li, J. (2022). The impact of internationalization on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Chinese listed construction companies. In International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (pp. 547-560). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3626-7_43
- Singh, D., & Delios, A. (2017). Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 615-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.02.002
- Slaiby, W., & Matta, F. (2025). The impact of cultural distance and political risk on SMEs’ internationalization strategies: The case of SMEs in the UAE and Lebanon. International Review of Management and Marketing, 15(2), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.17673
- Spadafora, E., Addo, K. A., Kostova, T., Kumodzie-Dussey, M. K., Leo, E., Marano, V., & van Essen, M. (2022). Board independence and firm internationalization: A meta-analysis. Multinational Business Review, 30(4), 499-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-04-2021-0055
- Suh, Y., & Kim, M. S. (2014). Internationally leading SMEs vs. internationalized SMEs: Evidence of success factors from South Korea. Journal of International Business Review, 23(4), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.03.002
- Tseng, M. L., & Chiu, A. S. (2013). Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.007
- Vecchiato, R. (2012). Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making: An integrated study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 436-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.010
- Verbeke, A., & Ciravegna, L. (2018). International entrepreneurship research versus international business research: A false dichotomy? Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0154-8
- Verbeke, A., Zargarzadeh, M. A., & Osiyevskyy, O. (2014). Internalization theory, entrepreneurship and international new ventures. Multinational Business Review, 22(3), 246-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-06-2014-0023
- Xiong, G., Li, L., & Hao, J. (2010). 2-tuple linguistic fuzzy ISM and its application. In Fuzzy Information and Engineering 2010: Volume I (pp. 353-362). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14880-4_37
- Yager, R. R., & Filev, D. P. (1994). Essentials of fuzzy modeling and control. New York, 388, 22-23.
- Yang, J., Cai, G., Zheng, G., & Gu, Q. (2022). Firm internationalization and cost of equity: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15(2), 100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100237
- Yang, M. M., Li, T., & Wang, Y. (2020). What explains the degree of internationalization of early-stage entrepreneurial firms? A multilevel study on the joint effects of entrepreneurial self-efficacy, opportunity-motivated entrepreneurship, and home country institutions. Journal of World Business, 55(6), 101114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101114
- Yayi, C. L. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and trade: Does export sophistication matter? Applied Economics, 56(2), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2166672
- Zhang, C., Yang, C., & Liu, C. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate risk-taking: Loss aversion or opportunity expectations. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 69, 101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101640
- Zhang, G., Wang, L., Guo, F., & Yang, G. (2021). Does corporate internationalization affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100794
- Zhou, C., & Su, D. (2019). Excess capacity and the real options value of multinationality. Economic Research Journal, 54(1), 20-35.