Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Strategic Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Associate Prof., Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

This research aims to design a model for the internationalization of companies operating under uncertainty, seeking to address the shortcomings of existing one-dimensional approaches that ignore the dynamic and behavioral complexities of stakeholders. This research is applied and developmental in terms of its purpose, and mixed and exploratory in terms of its type. Data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from managers and experts involved in the internationalization process of small and medium-sized companies, who were selected through purposive sampling. The final model was developed using fuzzy soft systems methodology and fuzzy structural interpretive modeling. The final model identifies key dimensions for the internationalization of companies under uncertainty. These dimensions include: monitoring macro trends, developing a technology ecosystem, financial and advisory support, developing standards, managing stakeholder relationships, developing specialized training centers, advanced intelligent systems for forecasting, developing flexible entry strategies, networking and strategic alliances, optimizing product quality and processes, and managing supply chain complexity. The presented model serves as an analytical tool for a deeper understanding of the complexities of internationalization in small and medium-sized enterprises and for more effective policymaking in the face of uncertainties in the business environment.
Introduction
To maintain and improve their competitive standing in the dynamic global marketplace, many businesses are adopting an internationalization strategy. The increasing volume of international trade and investment, coupled with the central role of firms in this arena, has made corporate internationalization a crucial topic in international business studies. The internationalization of a company is the process through which a business expands its operations beyond national borders and enters foreign markets. This process encompasses a wide range of activities, from establishing subsidiaries abroad to exporting goods and services internationally. By adopting an internationalization approach, companies can mitigate their business risks and achieve potentially greater returns compared to operating solely in domestic markets. However, the successful implementation of this strategy is influenced by numerous factors that must be carefully considered. When a company decides to enter international markets, it encounters distinct institutional and cultural characteristics that vary from country to country. Consequently, to succeed in this arena and owing to the inherent complexity and uncertainty of the process, managers require sufficient knowledge and awareness to efficiently process and analyze information and make sound decisions. This knowledge base enables them to effectively address the challenges arising from cultural and institutional differences.
In theoretical literature, the process of company internationalization is usually explained through two main perspectives. The first perspective suggests that the internationalization of companies occurs via an incremental process involving stages, beginning in the domestic market and gradually expanding to international ones. Conversely, the second perspective, derived from international entrepreneurship, posits that a company can access several global markets from the outset. Considering the diverse perspectives in international business research, Glaum & Oesterle contend that establishing a unified definition for company internationalization has remained difficult and challenging, even after several years of dedicated research in the field.
Johanson & Vahlne categorize company internationalization into four main stages: start-up, full launch, independent international activities, and joint international activities. Their viewpoint is predicated on the idea that internationalization involves creating and expanding connections with other actors within a foreign network. They assert that a company’s internationalization process initiates with interactions in local networks, subsequently extending to other countries as the business relationships within these networks mature. This development is accomplished through establishing new connections within networks new to the company, strengthening existing relationships in these networks, and ultimately integrating networks across different countries. Johanson & Vahlne define internationalization as the process of developing business relationship networks in other countries through expansion, penetration, and integration. The focus of this definition is clearly on relationships and networks, which subsequently facilitate companies’ entry into foreign market networks.
Liu & Ko view internationalization as the process of organizing and deploying global economic resources, such as capital, raw materials, human resources, information, markets, and management capabilities. Costa et al. believe that internationalization enables companies to access new markets to create novel business activities and generate profit. Finally, Dominguez & Mayrhofer state that, according to the born global model, certain companies rapidly enter a significant number of markets from inception. In fact, born global companies are those that have achieved a considerable degree of internationalization right from their inception or early operational stages. Therefore, considering the presence of diverse and influential stakeholders and actors, dynamic and behavioral complexities, and inherent uncertainties in the internationalization process of SMEs, coupled with the significant share of SMEs, the main research question is as follows:
What is the internationalization model for companies in small and medium-sized industries (SMEs) under conditions of uncertainty?
Methodology
This research employs a mixed-methods approach (both qualitative and quantitative) with an applied-developmental purpose and a descriptive-exploratory strategy. The primary aim is to provide solutions for the challenges of SME internationalization and to provide decision-making support to relevant stakeholders. Furthermore, due to a scarcity of sufficient information, the study also seeks to develop a comprehensive model for SME internationalization under conditions of uncertainty. The qualitative phase commenced with a literature review encompassing articles, books, projects, and documents related to SME internationalization. Subsequently, expert opinions, gathered through a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) framework and Fuzzy Interpretive Structural Modeling (FISM), were integrated to develop a final model for SME internationalization under uncertainty.
Results
This research utilized the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) to investigate the internationalization of SMEs. In the initial stage, dedicated to encountering and understanding the problematic situation, in-depth interviews with experts and stakeholders were conducted to extract actors from both the distant and near environments, leading to the development of a Rich Picture. The findings of this research confirm that the internationalization of SMEs is a multifaceted and dynamic process fundamentally dependent on the coordination and synergy between various factors across different levels. The conceptual model developed illustrates that success hinges upon a systematic approach that simultaneously integrates internal company factors, environmental dynamics, and institutional frameworks. Effective implementation of this model is contingent upon continuous monitoring of global activities and trends, rigorous assurance of methodological compatibility, proactive prediction and consideration of inherent uncertainties, and the committed participation of all key stakeholders, including SMEs, governmental bodies (such as the Industry, Mining, and Trade Organization), supporting entities (like the Chamber of Commerce and Industrial Estates Company), and regulatory agencies (Customs and the Standards Organization).

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Heidarizad, Z., Fazlzadeh, A., Ahmadian, V., & Nagdi, S. (2024). The impact of e-commerce on export: A meta-analytic review. Journal of International Business Administration, 7(2), 211-234. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22034/‌JIBA.2024.60534.2176 (in Persian).
  2. Rahimiaghdam, S., Sanoubar, N., & Ahmadian, A. (2023). Investigating the effect of strategic agility on SMEs international success with the mediating role of network-oriented growth. Journal of International Business Administration, 6(2), 177-194. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22034/‌JIBA.2023.55884.2030 (in Persian).
  3. Sanoubar, H., Jabbarzadeh, Y., & Hosseini, S. S. (2022). The role of innovation capability on export performance with the mediating role of social capital. Journal of International Business Administration, 5(3), 49-66. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22034/‌JIBA.2022.50028.1843 (in Persian).
  4. Magholi Hasanjani, A., Makui, A., & Bonyadi Naeini, A. (2023). Designing a dynamic model for internationalization of small & medium-sized knowledge-based enterprises (case study: herbal medicine industry). Journal of International Business Administration, 6(2), 1-22. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.22034/‌JIBA.2023.54010.1968 (in Persian).
  5. Adedoyin, F. F., Afolabi, J. O., Yalçiner, K., & Bekun, F. V. (2022). The export led growth in Malaysia: Does economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risks matter? Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2361. https:/‌/‌hdl.handle.net/‌11363/‌5588
  6. Ahmed, F. U., & Brennan, L. (2019). The impact of founder’s human capital on firms’ extent of early internationalisation: Evidence from a least-developed country. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(3), 615–659. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌s10490-019-09646-4
  7. Alcaraz, J., Martinez-Suarez, J., & Montoya, M. A. (2024). Effect of populism on the internationalization of emerging market firms. European Business Review, 36(1), 12-31. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌EBR-01-2023-0025
  8. Ansoff, H. I., Kipley, D., Lewis, A. O., Helm-Stevens, R., Ansoff, R., Ansoff, H. I., … & Ansoff, R. (2019). Strategic dimensions of internationalization (pp. 311-336). Springer International Publishing. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-319-99599-1_14
  9. Bacudio, L. R., Benjamin, M. F. D., Eusebio, R. C. P., Holaysan, S. A. K., Promentilla, M. A. B., Yu, K. D. S., & Aviso, K. B. (2016). Analyzing barriers to implementing industrial symbiosis networks using DEMATEL. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 7, 57-65. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.spc.2016.03.001
  10. Bae, J. W., Elkamhi, R., & Simutin, M. (2019). The best of both worlds: Accessing emerging economies via developed markets. The Journal of Finance, 74(5), 2579-2617. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.spc.2016.03.001
  11. Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A., & El Ghaoui, L. (2009). Robust optimization. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1515/‌9781400831050
  12. Bianchi, C., & Stoian, M. C. (2024). Exploring the role of managerial and organizational capabilities for the inbound internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 62(2), 724-762. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌00472778.2022.2082457
  13. Bianchi, C., & Wickramasekera, R. (2016). Antecedents of SME export intensity in a Latin American market. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4368-4376. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jbusres.2016.02.041
  14. Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, N., & Morgan, R. E. (2022). Unbundling the effects of internationalization on firm performance in emerging economies: The moderating effects of strategic resource decisions. Journal of International Marketing, 30(1), 55-74. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1177/‌1069031X211030686
  15. Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. (2016). Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 319-407. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.5465/‌19416520.2016.1120957
  16. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1037/‌qup0000196
  17. Cerrato, D., & Piva, M. (2012). The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 617–644. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌s10997-010-9166-x
  18. Chang, C. H., Chang, C. H., Hsu, P. K., & Yang, S. Y. (2019). The catalytic effect of internationalization on innovation. European Financial Management, 25(4), 942-977. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1111/‌eufm.12190
  19. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2020). Soft systems methodology. In Systems approaches to making change: A practical guide (pp. 201-253). London: Springer London. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-1-4471-7472-1_5
  20. Costa, A. D., Camboim, G. F., & Zen, A. C. (2018). Internationalization patterns and their effects on company performance. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management (JOSCM), 11(1), 53-63. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.12660/‌joscmv11n1p53-63
  21. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Ciravegna, L., Melgarejo, M., & Lopez, L. (2018). Home country uncertainty and the internationalization-performance relationship: Building an uncertainty management capability. Journal of World Business, 53(2), 209-221. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jwb.2017.11.002
  22. Danziger, E., & Danziger, L. (2025). Demand uncertainty and the optimal number of export destinations. Review of International Economics. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1111/‌roie.12780
  23. Dike, M. C., & Rose, E. L. (2017). Internationalization of mobile telecommunications: A systematic literature review. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(3), 308-321. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌RIBS-01-2017-0004
  24. Dominguez, N., & Mayrhofer, U. L. (2017). Internationalization of traditional SMEs. Journal of International Business Review, 26(1), 1051-1063. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.ibusrev.2017.03.010
  25. Du, J., Zhu, S., & Li, W. H. (2023). Innovation through internationalization: A systematic review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(3), 1217-1251. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌s10490-022-09814-z
  26. Fang, F. (2023). Corporate innovation and internationalization: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104087. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.frl.2023.104087
  27. Freixanet, J., & Rialp, J. (2022). Disentangling the relationship between internationalization, incremental and radical innovation, and firm performance. Global Strategy Journal, 12(1), 57-81. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1002/‌gsj.1412
  28. Gande, A., Schenzler, C., & Senbet, L. W. (2009). Valuation effects of global diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1515-1532. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1057/‌jibs.2009.59
  29. Glaum, M., & Oesterle, M. J. (2007). 40 years of research on internationalization and firm performance: More questions than answers? Management International Review, 47, 307-317. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌s11575-007-0018-0
  30. Gumus, A. T., Yayla, A. Y., Çelik, E., & Yildiz, A. (2013). A combined fuzzy-AHP and fuzzy-GRA methodology for hydrogen energy storage method selection in Turkey. Energies, 6(6), 3017-3032. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌en6063017
  31. Haarhaus, T., & Liening, A. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120033. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.techfore.2020.120033
  32. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69-78. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1111/‌j.1467-8551.2005.00429.x
  33. Hsu, W. T., Chen, H. L., & Cheng, C. Y. (2013). Internationalization and firm performance of SMEs: The moderating effects of CEO attributes. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 1-12. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jwb.2012.06.001
  34. Hu, G., & Liu, S. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and China’s export fluctuation in the post-pandemic era: An empirical analysis based on the TVP-SV-VAR model. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 788171. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3389/‌fpubh.2021.788171
  35. Ipsmiller, E., & Dikova, D. (2021). Internationalization from Central and Eastern Europe: A systematic literature review. Journal of International Management, 27(4), 100862. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.intman.2021.100862
  36. Jeng, D. J. F. (2015). Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration using the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 283-295. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.cie.2015.05.007
  37. Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L. G. (2013). Internationalisation in industrial systems—a network approach. In Strategies in Global Competition (RLE International Business) (pp. 287-314). Routledge. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1057/‌9781137508829.0011
  38. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2015). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. In International business strategy (pp. 33-59). Routledge. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1057/‌jibs.2009.24
  39. Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Deligonul, S., Perry, M. Z., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2012). A multilevel examination of the drivers of firm multinationality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 38(2), 502-530. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1177/‌0149206310369
  40. Kumari, S., Shirodkar, V., & McGuire, S. (2025). The impact of home institutions on the internationalization of emerging market SMEs: A systematic review. Multinational Business Review, 33(1), 68-96. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌MBR-03-2024-0045
  41. Lebedev, S., Sun, S. L., Markóczy, L., & Peng, M. W. (2021). Board political ties and firm internationalization. Journal of International Management, 27(3), 100860. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.intman.2021.100860
  42. Li, D., Zhao, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, L., & Liu, Y. (2023). Too far East is West: CEO overconfidence influences firm internationalization in emerging economies. Management International Review, 63(3), 377-402. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌s11575-023-00505-5
  43. Likitwongkajon, N., & Vithessonthi, C. (2023). Internationalization and firm performance. Global Finance Journal, 56, 100753. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.gfj.2022.100753
  44. Liu, H., & Ko, W. (2017). Measuring the degree of internationalization for Taiwanese banking industry: Scoring measurement by principal component analysis. International Business Research, 10(6), 212-226. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.5539/‌ibr.v10n6p212
  45. Loué, C. (2018). Firms and internationalization: An approach based on the skills and the profile of the entrepreneur. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 30(5), 345–374. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌08276331.2018.1459013
  46. Milevoj, E., Beleska-Spasova, E., & Bommer, W. H. (2021). Influence of CEO and firm characteristics on SME internationalization: Evidence from California. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 31. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.53703/‌001c.29810
  47. Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Datta, D. K. (2010). The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 197–205. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jwb.2009.12.003
  48. Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2011). The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: The choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 185-193. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jwb.2010.05.003
  49. Odei, S. A., & Stejskal, J. (2020). Firms’ pursuit of innovations through internationalization: A treatment effect estimation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(4), 837-866. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3846/‌tede.2020.12484
  50. Oesterle, M. J., Elosge, C., & Elosge, L. (2016). Me, myself and I: The role of CEO narcissism in internationalization decisions. International Business Review, 25(5), 1114-1123. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.ibusrev.2016.02.001
  51. Ouyang, Y. Y., Huang, X. F., & Zhong, L. M. (2020). The impact of outward foreign direct investment on environmental pollution in home country: Local and spatial spillover effects. China Industrial Economics, 2, 98-121. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.cjpre.2021.12.024
  52. Peng, M. W. (2014). Global strategy (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
  53. Pongelli, C., Majocchi, A., Bauweraerts, J., Sciascia, S., Caroli, M., & Verbeke, A. (2023). The impact of board of directors’ characteristics on the internationalization of family SMEs. Journal of World Business, 58(2), 101412. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jwb.2022.101412
  54. Pramod, V. R., & Banwet, D. K. (2013). Fuzzy ISM for analyzing the inhibitors of a telecom service supply chain. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), 6(1), 77-98. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.4018/‌jisscm.2013010105
  55. Roedder, F., & Schmid, S. (2023). How internationalization leads to more CSR: The case of Japanese firms. Journal of General Management, 03063070231197343. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1177/‌03063070231197343
  56. Ruzzier, M., & Ruzzier, M. K. (2015). On the relationship between firm size, resources, age at entry and internationalization: The case of Slovenian SMEs. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(1), 52-73. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3846/‌16111699.2012.745812
  57. Sang, M., Zhang, L., & Li, J. (2022). The impact of internationalization on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Chinese listed construction companies. In International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (pp. 547-560). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-981-99-3626-7_43
  58. Singh, D., & Delios, A. (2017). Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 615-627. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jwb.2017.02.002
  59. Slaiby, W., & Matta, F. (2025). The impact of cultural distance and political risk on SMEs’ internationalization strategies: The case of SMEs in the UAE and Lebanon. International Review of Management and Marketing, 15(2), 262-272. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.32479/‌irmm.17673
  60. Spadafora, E., Addo, K. A., Kostova, T., Kumodzie-Dussey, M. K., Leo, E., Marano, V., & van Essen, M. (2022). Board independence and firm internationalization: A meta-analysis. Multinational Business Review, 30(4), 499-525. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌MBR-04-2021-0055
  61. Suh, Y., & Kim, M. S. (2014). Internationally leading SMEs vs. internationalized SMEs: Evidence of success factors from South Korea. Journal of International Business Review, 23(4), 115-129. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.ibusrev.2013.03.002
  62. Tseng, M. L., & Chiu, A. S. (2013). Evaluating firm’s green supply chain management in linguistic preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 22-31. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jclepro.2010.08.007
  63. Vecchiato, R. (2012). Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making: An integrated study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 436-447. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.techfore.2011.07.010
  64. Verbeke, A., & Ciravegna, L. (2018). International entrepreneurship research versus international business research: A false dichotomy? Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 387-394. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1057/‌s41267-018-0154-8
  65. Verbeke, A., Zargarzadeh, M. A., & Osiyevskyy, O. (2014). Internalization theory, entrepreneurship and international new ventures. Multinational Business Review, 22(3), 246-269. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌MBR-06-2014-0023
  66. Xiong, G., Li, L., & Hao, J. (2010). 2-tuple linguistic fuzzy ISM and its application. In Fuzzy Information and Engineering 2010: Volume I (pp. 353-362). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-642-14880-4_37
  67. Yager, R. R., & Filev, D. P. (1994). Essentials of fuzzy modeling and control. New York, 388, 22-23.
  68. Yang, J., Cai, G., Zheng, G., & Gu, Q. (2022). Firm internationalization and cost of equity: Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15(2), 100237. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.cjar.2022.100237
  69. Yang, M. M., Li, T., & Wang, Y. (2020). What explains the degree of internationalization of early-stage entrepreneurial firms? A multilevel study on the joint effects of entrepreneurial self-efficacy, opportunity-motivated entrepreneurship, and home country institutions. Journal of World Business, 55(6), 101114. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jwb.2020.101114
  70. Yayi, C. L. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and trade: Does export sophistication matter? Applied Economics, 56(2), 169-185. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌00036846.2023.2166672
  71. Zhang, C., Yang, C., & Liu, C. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate risk-taking: Loss aversion or opportunity expectations. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 69, 101640. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.pacfin.2021.101640
  72. Zhang, G., Wang, L., Guo, F., & Yang, G. (2021). Does corporate internationalization affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 46, 100794. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.ememar.2021.100794
  73. Zhou, C., & Su, D. (2019). Excess capacity and the real options value of multinationality. Economic Research Journal, 54(1), 20-35.