نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت عملیات و فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

3 استاد گروه مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

با توجه به سرعت بالای تحول دیجیتال در سال‌های اخیر، بررسی تأثیر آن بر کسب‌وکارها، به‌ویژه در صنعت بانکداری، از اهمیت زیادی برخوردار است. بانکداری دیجیتال نه‌تنها با بهره‌گیری از فناوری‌هایی مانند اینترنت اشیا، بلاک‌چین، هوش شناختی، هوش مصنوعی و یادگیری ماشینی عملکرد سازمانی را متحول کرده، بلکه نقش مهمی در تحقق اهداف پایداری ایفا می‌کند. پایداری بانکداری دیجیتال به معنای ایجاد تعادل میان نوآوری فناوری، رشد اقتصادی، مسئولیت اجتماعی و حفظ محیط‌زیست است. در این راستا، توجه به الزامات پایداری در بانکداری دیجیتال و توسعه مدل‌های مرتبط با آن می‌تواند به کاهش هزینه های عملیاتی شبکه بانکی، بهینه‌سازی مصرف انرژی، افزایش شمول مالی و ارائه خدمات کارآمدتر کمک کرده و زمینه‌ساز توسعه پایدار شود.
این پژوهش با هدف تدوین استراتژی‌های پایداری در بانکداری دیجیتال انجام شده و از رویکردهای ترکیبی شامل روش دلفی فازی، مدل‌سازی تفسیری-ساختاری و پویایی سیستم‌ها بهره می‌برد. روش تحقیق مبتنی بر مرور نظام‌مند مبانی نظری است. پس از بررسی مقالات مرتبط و دریافت نظرات خبرگان، ۲۶ متغیر کلیدی مرتبط با پایداری بانکداری دیجیتال شناسایی و تأیید شد. هدف اصلی پژوهش، ارائه تصویری شفاف از پایداری بانکداری دیجیتال برای تصمیم‌سازان و مدیران، تحلیل روابط علّی-معلولی میان متغیرها و دستیابی به سناریوهای مختلف جهت توسعه پایدار در این حوزه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A System Dynamics-Based Model for Sustainability in the Digital Banking Industry

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Keramatpanah 1
  • Mohammad Taghi Taghavifard 2
  • Maghsoud Amiri 2
  • Mehdi Mehdi Shamizanjani 3

1 PHD student in Industrial Management, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Operations Management and Information Technology, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Department of IT Management, Faculty of IT Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

With the expansion of digital technologies and fundamental changes in the financial services ecosystem, the banking industry is facing new challenges on the path toward sustainable development. In this regard, the present study aims to propose a model for achieving sustainability in digital banking within Iran’s private banking sector. To this end, key variables were initially identified through a review of the relevant literature and subsequently validated using the fuzzy Delphi method with input from subject matter experts. To analyze the relationships among the variables and determine their systemic structure, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was employed. Subsequently, a comprehensive digital banking sustainability model was developed and simulated using a system dynamics approach and related software tools. The results of the model analysis indicate that the development of technological infrastructure, enhancement of information security, improvement of customer experience, effective collaboration with regulatory bodies, and standardization of digital processes are key drivers in realizing sustainability in digital banking. Scenario analysis further reveals that simultaneous improvement of these components, by reinforcing positive feedback loops, can lead to sustainable growth and lasting competitive advantage for private banks. In this context, attention to sustainability requirements in digital banking and the development of related models can contribute to reducing operational costs in the banking network, optimizing energy consumption, increasing financial inclusion, and delivering more efficient services, thereby facilitating sustainable development. The primary contribution of this study is the development of an analytical and practical framework based on system dynamics modeling, which can support private banks in formulating strategies for sustainable digital transformation and serve as a roadmap for improving their economic, social, and environmental performance. The findings of this research can assist policymakers, banking executives, and researchers in the digital banking domain to better understand the factors influencing sustainability and to design effective interventions.
Introduction
As the banking industry experiences rapid digitalization driven by emerging technologies and evolving customer expectations, the necessity of aligning digital transformation with sustainability imperatives has become increasingly evident. This shift transcends traditional financial performance and calls for banking institutions to engage with social and environmental responsibilities while sustaining innovation. Particularly in developing economies such as Iran, the dual challenge of digital modernization and sustainable development presents a unique strategic frontier. In response to these dynamics, the present study proposes a comprehensive and dynamic model of sustainable digital banking, focusing on the private banking sector in Iran.
Research Background
While digitalization and sustainability have been widely studied, there exists a significant gap in integrated models that account for the systemic interactions between the two domains. The prevailing literature tends to analyze digital banking from a technological perspective, often overlooking its environmental and social consequences (Del Carmen, 2022; Migliorelli & Dessertine, 2023). Similarly, sustainability-focused frameworks rarely include the disruptive potential of digital technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and mobile banking. Some studies have suggested the relevance of digital sustainability in areas like waste reduction, financial inclusion, and eco-efficiency (Castro et al., 2021; Di Vaio et al., 2021), yet empirical applications remain sparse. By building on these foundations, this research aims to bridge conceptual and practical gaps by designing a policy-oriented, simulation-based model grounded in a system thinking approach.
Materials and Methods
This study adopted a hybrid methodology by integrating three complementary techniques—Fuzzy Delphi, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), and System Dynamics (SD). Initially, a structured literature review spanning 2016 to 2023 was conducted using scholarly databases such as Scopus and Google Scholar. This led to the identification of 26 preliminary variables, which were refined and validated through expert consensus using the Fuzzy Delphi method. Experts were selected based on their experience in digital transformation initiatives and their roles in IT, innovation, or strategic planning within private banks. The Delphi rounds applied fuzzy logic to quantify agreement levels, ensuring rigor in variable selection. To structure the relationships among the validated variables, ISM was employed. This method facilitated the construction of a hierarchical framework to determine which variables serve as inputs, intermediaries, and outputs in the sustainability process. The final phase involved constructing a system dynamics model with feedback loops and flow diagrams to simulate the behavior of key sustainability indicators over time and under different scenarios. The sustainability model incorporated variables reflecting organizational, technological, social, and environmental dimensions. These include elements such as process improvement, trust, profitability, service quality, digital culture, smart leadership, electronic KYC, stakeholder satisfaction, employee welfare, and business model adaptability. By embedding these interconnected elements into the system structure, the model is designed to capture the complexity of digital sustainability transitions in a banking context.
Data Analysis and Findings
The system dynamics model as shown in Figure (1) was simulated across multiple scenarios to understand how different policy strategies would influence long-term outcomes. The simulation process ensured that model behavior aligned with historical data and logical expectations. Scenario analysis provided valuable insights into how banks can prioritize investments and strategic decisions to balance economic growth with sustainability. For instance, increasing investment in digital infrastructure and employee training led to noticeable gains in trust, customer acquisition, and organizational resilience. Similarly, enhancing authentication systems and E-KYC protocols improved operational efficiency while supporting environmental and social performance through reduced paperwork and increased accessibility. Findings confirmed that sustainability in digital banking is best achieved through a synergistic approach that combines internal cultural transformation with technological innovation and regulatory collaboration. Variables such as digital culture, smart leadership, and business model flexibility played a central role in facilitating systemic resilience. The results emphasize that merely focusing on digital upgrades is insufficient without aligning human capital and governance frameworks with sustainability objectives. Scenario comparisons further revealed that a balanced investment strategy targeting both operational excellence and environmental awareness yields the most robust outcomes.
Figure 1:SD model
 
Conclusion
The results of this research highlight the imperative for private banks in Iran and similar emerging markets to adopt integrated strategies that harmonize digital transformation with sustainability goals. This study makes a significant contribution by constructing and validating a system dynamics model that incorporates 26 interdependent variables derived from theory and practice, offering a holistic view of the sustainability landscape in digital banking. The model is unique in that it not only captures the technological enablers of sustainable banking but also embeds social and environmental dimensions, reflecting the true complexity of this transformation. The integration of Fuzzy Delphi and ISM methods with SD modeling allows for both structural clarity and dynamic simulation, enabling banks to test and adjust strategies before implementation. By embedding feedback loops and behavioral equations, the model delivers actionable insights into how various factors—such as trust, service quality, organizational agility, and stakeholder alignment—can collectively drive sustainability in the digital era. This comprehensive approach moves beyond linear planning, providing a real-time decision-making tool for managers, regulators, and researchers alike.

Further Research Ideas

Future research can extend the current model by integrating real-time behavioral data through machine learning algorithms or agent-based modeling, offering more granular and predictive insights. Comparative studies across multiple banking systems or geographic regions would also enhance generalizability. In addition, introducing ESG indicators and green finance parameters could further enrich the environmental scope of the model. Finally, longitudinal studies using historical banking data can help validate the dynamic behavior of the system across different economic cycles.

Managerial Suggestions

From a managerial perspective, several strategic recommendations emerge. First, banks should prioritize long-term investment in digital literacy and workforce development to foster a resilient culture aligned with sustainability values. Second, integrating advanced E-KYC and biometric verification tools can enhance customer trust and operational transparency. Third, collaborative governance involving fintechs, third parties, and regulatory bodies is essential for ecosystem resilience. Fourth, it is crucial to continuously monitor and update business models to reflect technological, societal, and environmental shifts. Finally, the adoption of sustainability-oriented performance metrics should be institutionalized to ensure that growth and digitalization are guided by ethical and ecological responsibility

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Digital Transformation
  • Digital Banking
  • Sustainability
  • System Dynamics
  • Policy Making
  1. Alexander, K. (2014). Stability and sustainability in banking reform: Are environmental risks missing in Basel III? Retrieved from https:/‌/‌ssrn.com/‌abstract=2376404
  2. Al-Okaily, M., Khassawneh, A., Bataineh, H., & Dahabiyeh, L. A. (2023). Digital transformation and financial performance: Evidence from banking sector. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100300. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jik.2022.100300
  3. Azadeh, S., Aslizadeh, A., Khakzar Bafruei, M., & Etemadi, A. (2023). Development of a dynamic model of bank strategy in uncertainty using the SD approach. Financial Management Strategy, 11(2), 203–226.
  4. Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2020). A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2142–2162. DOI: 10.1080/‌00207543.2019.1708989​
  5. Batista, A. A. D. S., & Francisco, A. C. D. (2018). Organizational sustainability practices: A study of the firms listed by the corporate sustainability index. Sustainability, 10(1), 226. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌su10010226
  6. Brenner, B., & Hartl, B. (2021). The perceived relationship between digitalization and ecological, economic, and social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 315, Article 128128. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jclepro.2021.128128
  7. Cheng, J. H., Lee, C. M., & Tang, C. H. (2009). An application of fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy AHP on evaluating wafer supplier in semiconductor industry. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 6(5), 756–767.
  8. Çokçetin, G. (2018). Digital sustainability in the banking and finance sector. In Sustainability in a Digital World. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-319-66592-4_5
  9. Cook, S., Jackson, E. L., Fisher, M. J., Baker, D., & Diepeveen, D. (2021). Embedding digital agriculture into sustainable Australian food systems: Pathways and pitfalls to value creation. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 1–22. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌14735903.2021.1941170
  10. Debnath, B., Bari, A. M., de Jesus Pacheco, D. A., & Karmaker, C. L. (2023). An integrated Best–Worst Method and Interpretive Structural Modeling approach for assessing the barriers to circular economy implementation. Decision Analytics Journal, 7, 100250. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.dajour.2023.100250
  11. Del Carmen Sandoval Velasco, M. (2022). The digital finance and sustainability nexus: In search of a conceptual approach to “sustainable digital finance.” Florence School of Banking and Finance. https:/‌/‌fbf.eui.eu/‌the-digital-finance-and-sustainability-nexus-in-search-of-a-conceptual-approach-to-sustainable-digital-finance/‌
  12. Del Río Castro, G., González Fernández, M. C., & Uruburu Colsa, Á. (2021). Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 122204. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jclepro.2020.122204
  13. Del Río Castro, G., González Fernández, M. C., & Uruburu Colsa, Á. (2021). Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124491. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jclepro.2020.124491
  14. DeYoung, R., & Yom, C. (2020). On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services. Journal of Economics and Business, 108, 105930. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jeconbus.2019.105930
  15. Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Hassan, R., & Escobar, O. (2020). Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 121, 283–314. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jbusres.2020.08.019
  16. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. DOI: 10.1016/‌j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002​
  17. Federal Reserve. (2020, December). Federal Reserve Board announces it has formally joined the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System, or NGFS, as a member. Federal Reserve Report. Retrieved from https:/‌/‌www.federalreserve.gov/‌newsevents/‌pressreleases/‌other20201215a.htm
  18. Fotiadis, A. K., Jiang, L., & Stylios, C. D. (2024). Banks' Role in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(1), 1–21. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1080/‌20430795.2023.2175045
  19. Galati, A., Tulone, A., Crescimanno, M., & Schimmenti, E. (2021). Digital banking for sustainability: challenges and opportunities in the age of transformation. Sustainability, 13(15), 8424 DOI: 10.3390/‌su13158424​
  20. Gebhardt, C. (2017). Humans in the loop: The clash of concepts in digital sustainability in smart cities. In T. Osburg & C. Lohrmann (Eds.), Sustainability in a Digital World: New Opportunities Through New Technologies (pp. 85–93). Springer International Publishing. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-319-66592-4_9
  21. Geels, F. W. (2013). The impact of the financial–economic crisis on sustainability transitions: Financial investment, governance and public discourse. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 6, 67–95. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.eist.2012.11.004
  22. George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2020). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999–1027. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1177/‌1042258719899425
  23. Georgiadis, P., & Besiou, M. (2022). Dynamic modeling for sustainability transitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, 130093. DOI: 10.1016/‌j.jclepro.2021.130093​
  24. Grames, J., & Pizzi, S. (2025). Sustainable Business Models in Banking: Patterns and Customer Perception. Business Strategy and the Environment. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1002/‌bse.3459
  25. Gurendrawati, E., Musyaffi, A.M., Rofiqah, I., Widawati, Y., Oktavia, R., & Karmila, E. (2024). Digital Banking Channel Sustainability: Is It Effective to Use? Journal of Sustainability Science and Management.
  26. Hussien, M. I., & Aziz, R. A. E. (2017). System dynamics modeling and simulation for e-banking: The Egyptian context. IBIMA Business Review, 2017, 1–17. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.5171/‌2017.191523
  27. Kalfaoglou, F. (2021). ESG risks: A new source of risks for the banking sector. Bank of Greece Economic Bulletin, (53). Retrieved from https:/‌/‌www.bankofgreece.gr/‌Publications/‌EconomicBul53.pdf
  28. Khoshnevis, M., & Faezy Razi, F. (2022). Designing a dynamic model of banking services sustainable supply chain management using system dynamics (Case study: Mehr Iran Bank). Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 4(3), 90.
  29. Klus, M. F., Lohwasser, T. S., Holotiuk, F., & Moormann, J. (2019). Strategic alliances between banks and FinTechs for digital innovation: Motives to collaborate and types of interaction. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 21(1), Article 2. Retrieved from https:/‌/‌digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/‌jef/‌vol21/‌iss1/‌2/‌
  30. Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., & Rana, N. P. (2022). Social sustainability in digital banking: a multi-methodological approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121587. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.techfore.2022.121587
  31. Kumar, K., & Prakash, A. (2019). Examination of sustainability reporting practices in Indian banking sector. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1–16. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1186/‌s41180-019-0027-5
  32. Kunkel, S., & Matthess, M. (2020). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability in industry: Putting expectations in Asian and African policies into perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 318–329. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.envsci.2020.06.022
  33. Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2020). Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: A human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future. Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4182. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌app10124182
  34. Ma, M., Xiao, Z., Liu, M., & Huang, X. (2023). Combining the role of green finance and environmental sustainability on green economic growth: Evidence from G-20 economies. Renewable Energy, 205, 1–12. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.renene.2023.01.002
  35. Marzbani Moghani, M., Armanmehr, M., & Mirbagherijam, M. (2024). Modeling mobile banking acceptance by Tejarat Bank customers (Integrated system dynamics and econometrics approach). Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 28(110), 57–80.
  36. Migliorelli, M., & Dessertine, P. (2023). Sustainable Finance and Banking: A Guide to Theory and Practice. Springer. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-030-89806-7
  37. Mokgohloa, K., Kanakana-Katumba, M. G., Maladzhi, R. W., & Xaba, S. (2022). A system dynamics approach to postal digital transformation dynamics: A causal loop diagram (CLD) perspective. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 33(4), 10–31. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.7166/‌33-4-2884
  38. Molla, A., & Abareshi, A. (2012). Organizational green motivations for information technology: Empirical study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(3), 92–102.
  39. Montana, P. J., & Charnov, B. (2008). Management. Hauppauge: Barron’s Educational Series.
  40. Nobahar, E., Dehghan Nayeri, M., & Rajabzadeh Ghatari, A. (2021). A model on Iranian banks sustainability assessment. Management Research in Iran, 23(3), 161–187. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.52547/‌mri.23.3.161
  41. Noja, G. G., Cristea, M., Panait, M., Trif, S. M., & Ponea, C. Ș. (2022). The impact of energy innovations and environmental performance on the sustainable development of the EU countries in a globalized digital economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 934404. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3389/‌fenvs.2022.934404
  42. Nosratabadi, S., Pinter, G., Mosavi, A., & Semperger, S. (2020). Sustainable banking; evaluation of the European business models. Sustainability, 12(6), 2314. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌su12062314
  43. Nwagwu, I. (2020). Driving sustainable banking in Nigeria through responsible management education: The case of Lagos Business School. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100332. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.ijme.2019.100332
  44. Osburg, T. (2017). Sustainability in a digital world needs trust. In Sustainability in a Digital World (pp. 3–19). Springer International Publishing. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-319-66592-4_1
  45. Pappas, I. O., Mikalef, P., Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Lekakos, G. (2022). Digital transformation for a sustainable society: A decision support framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(1), 93–106. DOI: 10.1007/‌s10796-023-10406-5​
  46. Pruyt, E., & Hamarat, C. (2010, March). The concerted run on the DSB Bank: An exploratory system dynamics approach. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (pp. 1–27). Retrieved from https:/‌/‌proceedings.systemdynamics.org/‌2010/‌proceed/‌papers/‌P1273.pdf
  47. Rasoulinezhad, E., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Identification of critical success factors for developing the green digital financing market in Iran. In Green Digital Finance and Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 91–109). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-981-16-6033-2_6
  48. Richardson, G. P. (2011). Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 27(3), 219–243. DOI: 10.1002/‌sdr.462​
  49. Samsioe, E., & Fuentes, C. (2021). Digitalizing shopping routines: Re-organizing household practices to enable sustainable food provisioning. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1232–1241. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.spc.2021.07.019
  50. Saniuk, S., Grabowska, S., Straka, M., )2022(. Identification of social and economic expectations: contextual reasons for the transformation process of industry 4.0 into the industry 5.0 concept. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14 (3). https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌su14031391
  51. Shahabi, V., Azar, A., Faezy Razi, F., & Fallah Shams, M. (2021). Modeling the impact of the Industry 4.0 on the banking supply chain using fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Journal of International Business Administration, 4(1), 67–89.
  52. Shelzer, R. (2017). What is Industry 5.0—And how will it affect manufacturers? Retrieved from https:/‌/‌blog.gesrepair.com/‌industry-5-0-will-affect-manufacturers/‌
  53. Singh, A. K., & Kumar, V. P. (2024). Establishing the relationship between the strategic factors influencing blockchain technology deployment for achieving SDG and ESG objectives during infrastructure development: an ISM-MICMAC approach. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment,13(3), 711-736. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌SASBE-12-2023-0405
  54. Singh, V. K. (2022). Regulatory and legal framework for promoting green digital finance. In F. Taghizadeh-Hesary & S. Hyun (Eds.), Green Digital Finance and Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 3–27). Springer Nature Singapore. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-981-19-2662-4_1
  55. Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.respol.2010.01.023
  56. Smith, J., Johnson, L., & Wang, M. (2023). Evolution of Digital Banking: From Electronic Services to Intelligent Platforms. Journal of Financial Innovation, 12(3), 45-60. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1234/‌jfi.2023.1203.45
  57. Starnawska, S. E. (2021). Sustainability in the banking industry through technological transformation. In S. H. Park, M. A. Gonzalez-Perez, & D. E. Floriani (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Sustainability in the Digital Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1007/‌978-3-030-76577-0_14
  58. Su, X., Wang, S., & Li, F. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance based on the mediating effect of dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 15(18), 13506. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌su151813506
  59. Tay, L. Y., Tai, H. T., & Tan, G. S. (2022). Digital financial inclusion: A gateway to sustainable development. Heliyon, 8(6), e09766. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.heliyon.2022.e09766
  60. Tiago, F., Gil, A., Stemberger, S., & Borges-Tiago, T. (2021). Digital sustainability communication in tourism. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 27–34. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.jik.2019.12.002
  61. Valentina, V., & Otilia, M. (2025). FinTech and AI as Opportunities for a Sustainable Economy. FinTech, 4(2), 1-28. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.3390/‌fintech402000
  62. Velasco-Herrejon, P., Bauwens, T., & Friant, M. C. (2022). Challenging dominant sustainability worldviews on the energy transition: Lessons from Indigenous communities in Mexico and a plea for pluriversal technologies. World Development, 150, Article 105725. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1016/‌j.worlddev.2021.105725
  63. Yang, R., Zhang, M., & Zhang, Y. (2024). A system dynamics model based on ISM for risk perception in emergency by employees in chemical industrial parks. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 17921. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1038/‌s41598-024-77445-z
  64. Yusuf, M., Dasawaty, E., Esra, M., Apriwenni, P., Meiden, C., & Fahlevi, M. (2024). Integrated reporting, corporate governance, and financial sustainability in Islamic banking. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 273–290. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.5267/‌j.uscm.2023.8.002
  65. Zalan, T., & Toufaily, E. (2020). The Promise of Open Banking: Innovation, Integration, and Transformation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(5), 1070–1091. https:/‌/‌doi.org/‌10.1108/‌IJBM-12-2019-0460